Diary of a Web 2.0 Dream
I've done this before and not followed up, but here's to not being lame about the future implications of awesome work....I've a plan to resurrect the fatdog website. First step in that plan is to get rid of the fatdog website. Heh. Second step is to reintroduce that site as the official "thosekids.org." When I first purchased the domain name in 2001 it was to be a location for all sorts of web projects and productions (hence the sometimes bantered moniker 'thosekids productions'). That's fallen-through a bit (or so I realize over five years later) and I'm rethinking the way to approach that goal. fatdog in its hey-day was an excellent site that a trusted and excitable throng of repeat visitors frequented. The site had nearly 30 contributors and 50 additional frequent readers at its peak. That was about three-to-four years ago.
So now there's the Web 2.0 movement: a swing to produce websites where content is generated by, described by, and marketed by the very people that read it. You can see this on sites like flickr and digg and del.icio.us and YouTube and and and and... The root of this is in a feature you might be familiar with called 'tagging.' Users assign words -- adjectives, nouns, verbs, anything -- to content that describes it. Tag a picture of a dildo things like 'dildo,' 'sextoy,' 'dirty,' and 'dick' and you're on the right track.
The problem has been rethinking a site that has its roots very much set in the old web -- the web where some people contribute and most people just read and maybe there's a discussion board, but that's it. The site has a few different sections that different material goes in and there's probably tabs on the top to navigate between sections and huzzah! you have a website.
How do you successfully take a bucket of content entrenched in that old manner of thinking and make it effectively new, flashy, and different for today?
I'm approaching it by slashing out the sections of the website, adding a lot of new avenues for creativity and yes -- all of those fancy Web 2.0 things people love these days like tagging. You should be able to have discussion about everything on the page, the navigation will be content-centric, not type-of-content-centric... meaning you'll be able to read an article about 'politics' and you'll find related materail about 'politics.' If you think a story you're reading should be categorized a 'horror,' but the author forgot to make that connection, you'll be able to list it as such -- so everyone can find it. It will make reading more fun, it will make searching more intuitive. And if you're one of the writers on the site, you'll be able to contribute anything your heart desires: reviews, photographs, stories, poems, songs, rants, raves, links, something we haven't seen before.
That's the plan at least. And I'm actually about 1/3 of the way there. The image's a look at the new site in an early phase (before the right-side navigation was pulled out and replaced with tag lists and interaction). Maybe I'll get it done by the goal of "sometime this November."
Maybe.


